网络中立性与约翰·麦凯恩。消费者对无知的政客。党派不谈，任何人求婚我们允许运营商打击，并确定哪些内容，我们可以通过我们的互联网和ISP连接运行可能仍然有他们的秘书打印出来的电子邮件为他们。你是否允许Verizon公司和AT＆T以确定谁可以拨打电话到他们的无线网络？不，这是一个荒谬的想法，并且不属于这里节流我们对坡道互联网either.The核心问题是迅速增加的1，2，5，7Mps连接使用，改变了运营商的超额认购模式的经济学共享服务于我们的家庭或企业。那怎么共享基础设施工程的经济性 - 我们不能都跑满负荷我们的DSL或电缆调制解调器连接，或管道上游将迅速填满，没有人会拥有他们所需要的带宽。随着越来越多的客户前来乘坐，使用模式的改变，并停止产能满足需求，它的时间来升级基础设施。和运营商采取的更快，更便宜的网络设备和pipes.That的它是如何工作的，而不是由运营商为某些类型的流量产生瓶颈，他们不喜欢经济学的优势。以节流流量的某些种类的选择是留在升级基础设施，或为更高优先级的流量类型提供超值服务的竞争力。没有硬盘驱动器供应商把他们的磁盘驱动器的限制，如果你对他们的存储大的视频和音乐文件？没有，但是这是麦凯恩的说法，贝利 - 哈钦森和运营商正在。 And it's on the wrong side of this argument. When are our politicians going to start representing the consumer and not just big business? Frankly, these politicians run the risk of angering not hundreds or thousands, but tens of millions of Internet users by blocking the FCC's attempts at keeping our Internet highways free of toll booths.I support the FCC's action to put regulations in place that actually helps keep what we have, rather than allowing carriers to traffic shape our service to their own desire and benefit. It's because of the open access the Internet provides to all types of data that we have continuous innovation and entrepreneurial creation of new products and services. McCain. Leave well enough alone and let the FCC do its job and protect the consumer rather than just big businesses for a change. We've had enough corporate bailouts. Let's not give the Internet carriers theirs.
