波音数据被盗家伙对我来说有点好奇心。这是一个显然对公司和FAA对零部件检查流程来说显然是如此沮丧,以至于他愿意冒着他的自由冒险。或者,也许这是一个由正义愤慨如此蒙蔽的人,即他根本无法区分对的权利和错误。或者,他只是一个真正以为他逃脱它的傲慢CAD?我的钱在选项中。毕竟,这些日子盗窃的故事是大新闻;如果那家伙在思考,我相信他知道他会被带走,如果他被抓住了,那就去了,如果他是理性,他必须知道,随着时间的推动,他必须知道他被抓住了很高。我们不是在谈论这里的一个或两个机密备忘录。据新闻报道,官方收费声称该家伙下载了数百和数千个与波音相关文件。问题是,一个生成生动的辩论,为什么据报道,他在三年内抓住了这家伙,他据报道藏起了公司珠宝? Sounds like he had made his dismay known -- why didn't that trigger more scrutiny? Maybe the data-leakage protection technology wasn't all that in 2003, or even in 2006, but really, I'm hard pressed to lay this entirely at the fault of human behavior and not consider it as a technology shortcoming, too. How many more examples do we need before companies get serious, real serious about content monitoring and digital rights management? Chief information security officers must wage war!读故事分享您的意见看看最新的内容监控工具
波音:什么是更糟糕的,商业或技术疲软?
版权所有©2007.Raybet2