跨公司认证吗?

应该有跨公司认证吗?它是如何运作的?这个想法是在我最近教Office通信服务器课程时产生的。微软和“另一家拥有绿色设备的公司”之间存在很多比较问题。因为有这么多的问题,这让我想到也许跨平台认证是有一些有效性的。是的,CompTIA提供了一个“供应商中立”的认证。但这并不是厂商中立的,而是跨厂商的应用程序或认证。那么,需要这样的认证吗?我想如果有一个主题可以证明这一点,那就是这个。当只使用一个平台时,尝试理解Voice over IP是很困难的,尝试整合两个平台会让生活变得有趣!在每一堂课上,总是会有关于这个公司的作品如何与另一个公司的作品相结合的问题。 There are not that many Voice experts out there and there are even fewer who know two distinct Voice platforms well. If you want a good field to specialize in – Voice will be the one (and besides, soon there will be a Microsoft Certified Master certification available) as there will only be an increased demand for Voice experts. How would this certification be based? Well, the individuals would need to be expert on and have detailed knowledge about a cross segment of knowledge between Microsoft, Cisco, Nortel and other voice product manufacturers and how they integrate/work with each other. That would be the theoretical knowledge test. There would also be a hands-on test something between the CCIE hands-on test and the new Microsoft testing format – something that eliminates any possibility of a “paper-voice” expert. The hands-on test would cover the deploying and integrating of various voice products – success being a “User” can make and receive calls and whatever features are deemed applicable. This is an interesting idea – don’t think it will ever see the light of day – but something to think about at least.

加入网络世界社区有个足球雷竞技app脸谱网LinkedIn对自己最关心的话题发表评论。
相关:

版权所有©2008 IDG ComRaybet2munications, Inc.

SD-WAN买家指南:向供应商(和您自己)提出的关键问题